<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>InfoSecPodcast.com &#187; Security How To&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/category/security/security-how-tos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com</link>
	<description>Information Security related news, opinions and ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<copyright>2011 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>chris@infosecpodcast.com (InfoSecPodcast.com)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>chris@infosecpodcast.com (InfoSecPodcast.com)</webMaster>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Information Security related news, opinions and ramblings</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>InfoSecPodcast.com</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>InfoSecPodcast.com</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>chris@infosecpodcast.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/wp-includes/images/pod_feed_logo.gif" />
		<item>
		<title>Some things to look for in your SecurID / Remote Access logs</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2011/06/some-things-to-look-for-in-your-securid-remote-access-logs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2011/06/some-things-to-look-for-in-your-securid-remote-access-logs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 03:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[APT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security How To's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2 form factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; The RSA SecurID token has arguably been the defacto second factor authenticator for many years. Despite the recent breach at RSA I do not see many organizations moving to alternate vendors or other second factor technologies, like PKI / SmartCards or telephone based solutions. In the wake of the RSA breach most companies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/rsa_sd700_category.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-298" title="RSA SecurID" src="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/rsa_sd700_category.gif" alt="" width="170" height="136" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
The <a href="http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=1156" target="_blank">RSA SecurID</a> token has arguably been the defacto second factor authenticator for many years. Despite the<a href="http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=3872" target="_blank"> recent breach at RSA</a> I do not see many organizations moving to alternate vendors or other second factor technologies, like PKI / SmartCards or telephone based solutions. In the wake of the RSA breach most companies seem to be replacing tokens and hardening their SecurID &amp; Authentication Manager infrastructures and reviewing relevant security processes. I have seen a couple organizations look to add additional authentication methods to supplement existing SecurID implementations for remote access, like requiring PKI certs in addition to SecurID for Remote Access. Obviously this capability is dependent on your Remote Access vendor. If you are staying with SecurID for your Remote Access authentication you should be taking a hard look at your access logs. Below are some searches that you may find useful if your logging environment can perform them. The ability to perform GeoIP lookups and calculate temporal data is required for some of the searches. Many of these searches will require you to baseline this activity in your environment to reduce the false positives.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>Top 20 Remote Access source IP addresses for the last 30 days</li>
<li>Top 20 Remote Access users for the last 30 days</li>
<li>Remote Access attempt from non-US IP address</li>
<li>Remote Access attempts at &#8220;odd&#8221; hours</li>
<li> Remote Access failures from multiple</li>
<li> Remote Access attempts from one IP address for two or more usernames</li>
<li>Remote Access attempts for one username from at least two different IP addresses in XX minutes</li>
<li>Remote Access attempts for one username from at least two different countries in an X hour period</li>
<li>Remote Access sessions of longer than usual duration</li>
<li>SecurID authentication attempt involving Invalid / Revoked / Expired tokens</li>
<li>SecurID authentication attempts involving one username and multiple token serial numbers</li>
<li>SecurID authentication attempts involving one token serial number and multiple usernames</li>
<li>SecurID &#8220;Right Token code, wrong PIN&#8221; messages</li>
</ul>
<p>There are probably others that can be added to the list.  Your RSA sales rep can provide you with a copy of their Security best practices guide for Authentication Manager as well as their Log Monitoring Guidelines. The NSA&#8217;s Information Assurance Directorate has also published an unclassified advisory on securing your SecurID infrastructure. If you Google it you should be able to find a copy.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<img src="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=295&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2011/06/some-things-to-look-for-in-your-securid-remote-access-logs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSA&#8217;s guide to securing routers</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2007/02/nsas-guide-to-securing-routers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2007/02/nsas-guide-to-securing-routers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security How To's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security-how-tos/2007/02/nsas-guide-to-securing-routers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My old pal&#8217;s from the System Network and Attack Center at the NSA have a great guide on securing routers. The Router Security Configuration Guide has a good amount of the networking basics and then goes into a lot of hands on configurations and best practices. Cisco routers are covered specifically but I would imagine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/images/nsa.png" title="NSA National Security Agency" alt="NSA National Security Agency" height="50" width="50" /></p>
<p>My old pal&#8217;s from the <a href="http://www.nsa.gov/snac/routers/C4-040R-02.pdf" target="_blank">System Network and Attack Center</a> at the NSA have a great <a href="http://www.nsa.gov/snac/routers/C4-040R-02.pdf" target="_blank">guide on securing routers</a>. The Router Security Configuration Guide has a good amount of the networking basics and then goes into a lot of hands on configurations and best practices. Cisco routers are covered specifically but I would imagine that a lot of the commands would be the same for other routers that support CLI. Combining information from this guide along with using the <a href="http://http://www.cisecurity.org/bench_cisco.html" target="_blank">Router Audit Tool (RAT)</a> from the <a href="http://www.cisecurity.org/" target="_blank">Center for Internet Security</a> will get you going in the right direction.</p>
<p>I think that routers are one of the most overlooked pieces of perimeter security. A finely tuned border router can do a lot for you and your security posture.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/%3Cstrong%3ENSA" rel="tag"> <strong>NSA</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/SNAC" rel="tag"> SNAC</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/router" rel="tag"> router</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/information+security%3C%2Fstrong%3E" rel="tag"> information security</strong> </a></p>
<img src="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=95&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2007/02/nsas-guide-to-securing-routers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>URL Obfuscation Examples</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/11/url-obfuscation-examples/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/11/url-obfuscation-examples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 01:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security How To's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security-how-tos/2006/11/url-obfuscation-examples/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web browsers understand all sorts of URL formats. If you want to go to Google you put http://www.google.com in your browser. These URL&#8217;s are also valid for Google as well: http://1208930147 and http://%67%6f%6f%67%6c%65%2e%63%6f%6d For a good explanation as to why this is and what URL obfuscation is used for, check out this post. &#8211;Chris Technorati [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web browsers understand all sorts of URL formats. If you want to go to Google you put http://www.google.com in your browser. These URL&#8217;s are also valid for Google as well:</p>
<p><a href="http://1208930147/">http://1208930147</a></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><a href="http://%67%6f%6f%67%6c%65%2e%63%6f%6d/">http://%67%6f%6f%67%6c%65%2e%63%6f%6d</a></p>
<p>For a good explanation as to why this is and what URL obfuscation is used for, check out this <a target="_blank" href="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2006/09/03/url-obfuscation/">post</a>.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/URL" rel="tag"> URL</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/obfuscation" rel="tag"> obfuscation</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Browser" rel="tag"> Browser</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Google" rel="tag"> Google </a></p>
<img src="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=80&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/11/url-obfuscation-examples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skype Security</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/10/skype-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/10/skype-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security How To's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security-how-tos/2006/10/skype-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use Skype fairly regularly as do many people I know. In fact, you can Skype me at chrisharringtonor leave me voicemail at 603-397-3392 (also Skype). Over the past couple months I have seen some interesting information and links on Skype and it&#8217;s security and anonymity. I thought I would share some of these. Anonymity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use <a target="_blank" href="http://www.skype.com">Skype</a> fairly regularly as do many people I know. In fact, you can Skype me at <a href="callto://chrisharrington">chrisharrington</a>or leave me voicemail at 603-397-3392 (also Skype). Over the past couple months I have seen some interesting information and links on Skype and it&#8217;s security and anonymity. I thought I would share some of these.</p>
<p><strong>Anonymity</strong><br />
Skype is basically Voice over IP (VoIP) using some peer to peer (P2P) technologies. I am not going to go into the details here. If you want to learn more about how Skype works check out this <a target="_blank" href="http://www.skype.com/download/explained.html">link</a>. Since Skype is P2P based many people believe that there is an inherent security, due to the multiple peers involved with the call. This is simply not true . If it has an IP address it is traceable to some extent. Kobi Alexander (former CEO of Comverse and Federal Fugitive) found this one out the hard way. He placed a one minute Skype call which investigators traced to Sri Lanka. He was arrested in Namibia shortly after.  George Mason University has published a paper on <a target="_blank" href="http://ise.gmu.edu/%7exwangc/Publications/CCS05-VoIPTracking.pdf">Tracking Anonymous PeertoPeer VoIP Calls on the Internet.</a> It&#8217;s an interesting read.</p>
<p><strong> Disabling Super Node</strong><br />
Skype has the ability (and authority under the EULA you didn&#8217;t read) to use your PC as a Super Node. Skype uses Super Nodes to route Skype phone calls. If you have a reasonable fast processor and fast Internet connection your PC may be tasked with being a Super Node. The concern here is that Skype could plug up your network with calls being routed to other Skype users. This was enough of a concern to the folks at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory that they wrote a <a target="_blank" href="https://netweb.fnal.gov/skype/skype.htm">how-to on disabling super node / relaying in Skype</a>.</p>
<p><strong>**DISCLAIMER:**</strong>  Disabling Super Node is Skype *may* be in violation of their Terms of Service. I have not read closely it so I do not know for sure. Proceed at your own risk and I take no responsibility.</p>
<p><strong>Disable File Transfer &#038; API access</strong><br />
Transferring files using IM / Chat / VOIP clients has been problematic at best because of the risk of passing malicious files. Most commercial AntiVirus vendors don&#8217;t have tight integration with these types of products. There are AV plugins for Outlook and IE but not may for Trillian or mirc. The Skype Security Blog has a post on <a target="_blank" href="http://share.skype.com/sites/security/2006/03/admin_control_of_skype_feature.html#more">Disabling File Transfers</a>.</p>
<p>On that same blog post is a procedure for disabling access to the Skype API. As the saying goes, if you don&#8217;t need it&#8230;don&#8217;t turn it on.</p>
<p>There is also a good whitepaper on Skype security by Simson Garfinkel <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tacticaltech.org/files/tacticaltech/Skype_Security.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:ea3df3d6-e430-48df-916b-6941bfe841e5" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline">Technorati tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/Skype">Skype</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/security">security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/P2P">P2P</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/Kobi%20Alexander">Kobi Alexander</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/Super%20Node">Super Node</a></div>
<img src="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=61&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/10/skype-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securing Microsoft Office</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/10/securing-microsoft-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/10/securing-microsoft-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security How To's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security-how-tos/2006/10/securing-microsoft-office/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SecurityFocus has posted a two part article on securing Microsoft Office, written by Khushbu Jithra. It&#8217;s a pretty good article combo with the first article talking about Office&#8217;s security issues and the second article covering the forensics involved. &#8211;Chris Technorati tags: Microsoft Office, Security, vulnerability, security focus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.securityfocus.com">SecurityFocus</a> has posted a two part article on securing Microsoft Office, written by <a href="mailto:khushbu.jithra@niiconsulting.com">Khushbu Jithra</a>. It&#8217;s a pretty good article combo with the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1874">first article</a> talking about Office&#8217;s security issues and the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1875">second article</a> covering the forensics involved.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
<div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline" id="0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:834f54f8-e129-4b0a-9c19-55d3df3ef82a" class="wlWriterSmartContent">Technorati tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/Microsoft%20Office">Microsoft Office</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/Security">Security</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/vulnerability">vulnerability</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/security%20focus">security focus</a></div>
<img src="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=62&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/10/securing-microsoft-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demystifying 802.1x</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/09/demystifying-8021x/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/09/demystifying-8021x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security How To's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security-how-tos/2006/09/demystifying-8021x/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across this white paper by Fluke Networks. It does a great job of visually representing the components in 802.1x, how the various handshake&#8217;s work and different protocols involved. Definitely worth a read if you want a cheat sheet on 802.1x. It&#8217;s through Bitpipe so you will have to register to download it. &#8211;Chris [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across this <a target="_blank" href="http://searchsecurity.bitpipe.com/detail/RES/1148301225_617.html">white paper</a> by Fluke Networks. It does a great job of visually representing the components in 802.1x, how the various handshake&#8217;s work and different protocols involved.</p>
<p>Definitely worth a read if you want a cheat sheet on 802.1x. It&#8217;s through Bitpipe so you will have to register to download it.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/802.1x" rel="tag"> 802.1x</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Fluke" rel="tag"> Fluke</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Bitpipe" rel="tag"> Bitpipe </a></p>
<img src="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=52&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/09/demystifying-8021x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MS Exchange build numbers for pentesting</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/08/ms-exchange-build-numbers-for-pentesting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/08/ms-exchange-build-numbers-for-pentesting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security How To's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security-how-tos/2006/08/ms-exchange-build-numbers-for-pentesting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever telnet&#8217;d to an MS Exchange server and wondered what Service Pack or Release version it was? I know I have. It can be a good way to double check what Nessus or another VA tool told you was a vulnerable version. CDOLive has a nice table that matches Version, Service Pack and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever telnet&#8217;d to an MS Exchange server and wondered what Service Pack or Release version it was? I know I have. It can be a good way to double check what Nessus or another VA tool told you was a vulnerable version. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cdolive.com/build.htm">CDOLive</a> has a nice table that matches Version, Service Pack and release date for Exchange versions since 4.0. So the next time you see thison port 25:</p>
<p>220 mydomain.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.5.7226.6 ready at<br />
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:11:32 -0400</p>
<p>you can tell that it is at least MS Exchange 2003 with Service Pack 1 installed. They don&#8217;t seem to cover the Small Business Server versions of Exchange. My SBS 2003 returns a version string of 6.0.3790.1830, which is not listed. They also don&#8217;t cover the myriad of hotfixes / updates that change a build number. Still a good reference though as a place to start.</p>
<p>Outlook build numbers are listed there as well.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Exchange" rel="tag"> Exchange</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Pentest" rel="tag"> Pentest</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Outlook" rel="tag"> Outlook</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Microsoft" rel="tag"> Microsoft </a></p>
<img src="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=37&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/08/ms-exchange-build-numbers-for-pentesting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything you wanted to know about SQL injection</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/08/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-sql-injection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/08/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-sql-injection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 02:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security How To's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security-how-tos/2006/08/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-sql-injection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok&#8230;it&#8217;s probably not EVERYTHING but I thought it was a pretty good article. Besides, that is their title to the article, not mine. I like that it covered not only execution of a SQL injection attack but also how to detect it and tips to prevent such an attack. Application security is not my strongest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok&#8230;it&#8217;s probably not EVERYTHING but I thought it was a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hiveminds.co.uk/node/3104">pretty good article</a>. Besides, that is their title to the article, not mine. <img src='http://www.infosecpodcast.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I like that it covered not only execution of a SQL injection attack but also how to detect it and tips to prevent such an attack. Application security is not my strongest skill so there is a chance that the article will not interest real app-sec pro.</p>
<p>If you are looking to learn more about application security (web application security specifically), check out <a target="_blank" href="http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Main_Page">OWASP</a>. It&#8217;s the Open Web Application Security Project. There are local chapters all over the world.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris<br /><p>Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/SQL+injection" rel="tag"> SQL injection</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/application+security" rel="tag"> application security </a></p>
<img src="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=25&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/08/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-sql-injection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

