<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NAC Panel Discussion: What is the state of NAC?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2008/10/nac-panel-discussion-what-is-the-state-of-nac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2008/10/nac-panel-discussion-what-is-the-state-of-nac/</link>
	<description>Information Security related news, opinions and ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:22:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2008/10/nac-panel-discussion-what-is-the-state-of-nac/comment-page-1/#comment-28754</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?p=184#comment-28754</guid>
		<description>Paul Roberts of The 451 Group is doing a webinar next week on &quot;What&#039;s New, What&#039;s Next in NAC?&quot; Subject will include what&#039;s new and what&#039;s next in the network access control (NAC) market? 

Do you wonder if Cisco, Microsoft, Juniper and Symantec are delivering on their NAC promise? Or if NAC appliances are finding more &quot;traction&quot; than framework, software or virtual solutions?

Register to attend - http://tinyurl.com/6p9n5p

Live Webinar: What&#039;s New, What&#039;s Next in NAC?
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Time: 8:00AM(PST), 11:00AM (EST)
Presented by: Gord Boyce, President, ForeScout Technologies and Paul Roberts, Senior Analyst/Enterprise Security, The 451 Group</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Roberts of The 451 Group is doing a webinar next week on &#8220;What&#8217;s New, What&#8217;s Next in NAC?&#8221; Subject will include what&#8217;s new and what&#8217;s next in the network access control (NAC) market? </p>
<p>Do you wonder if Cisco, Microsoft, Juniper and Symantec are delivering on their NAC promise? Or if NAC appliances are finding more &#8220;traction&#8221; than framework, software or virtual solutions?</p>
<p>Register to attend &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6p9n5p">http://tinyurl.com/6p9n5p</a></p>
<p>Live Webinar: What&#8217;s New, What&#8217;s Next in NAC?<br />
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009<br />
Time: 8:00AM(PST), 11:00AM (EST)<br />
Presented by: Gord Boyce, President, ForeScout Technologies and Paul Roberts, Senior Analyst/Enterprise Security, The 451 Group</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisb</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2008/10/nac-panel-discussion-what-is-the-state-of-nac/comment-page-1/#comment-28724</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?p=184#comment-28724</guid>
		<description>heh, indeed you are right.

Well, I guess it is a good sign when there are two NAC panels taking place on the same day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, indeed you are right.</p>
<p>Well, I guess it is a good sign when there are two NAC panels taking place on the same day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2008/10/nac-panel-discussion-what-is-the-state-of-nac/comment-page-1/#comment-28723</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?p=184#comment-28723</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

Thanks for the comment. I think you may be thinking of a different discussion. This was a closed door meeting at a federal facility with only 3 vendors in attendance. You are correct in that few are doing .1x. Nobody in this meeting were using it on the wired and about 1/3 were using it on wireless.

--Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. I think you may be thinking of a different discussion. This was a closed door meeting at a federal facility with only 3 vendors in attendance. You are correct in that few are doing .1x. Nobody in this meeting were using it on the wired and about 1/3 were using it on wireless.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisb</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2008/10/nac-panel-discussion-what-is-the-state-of-nac/comment-page-1/#comment-28722</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?p=184#comment-28722</guid>
		<description>I was lurking in the audience at this discussion.  There were some questions asked of the audience that I found interesting.  When asked how many were planning to roll out NAC, I saw two or three hands.  When asked how many were planning to roll out 802.1X, I saw none.  Which means, either they already rolled out .1X (doubtful) or they plan on doing NAC without it.

Sorry I did not get a chance to come and meet you in person, I did not stay through the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was lurking in the audience at this discussion.  There were some questions asked of the audience that I found interesting.  When asked how many were planning to roll out NAC, I saw two or three hands.  When asked how many were planning to roll out 802.1X, I saw none.  Which means, either they already rolled out .1X (doubtful) or they plan on doing NAC without it.</p>
<p>Sorry I did not get a chance to come and meet you in person, I did not stay through the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2008/10/nac-panel-discussion-what-is-the-state-of-nac/comment-page-1/#comment-28721</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?p=184#comment-28721</guid>
		<description>Alan, 

Nothing personal. Sometimes you have to work with what you are handed :) I would like to have had a little more involvement in that piece of the process. It would have been good to have you and your perspective there.

--Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, </p>
<p>Nothing personal. Sometimes you have to work with what you are handed <img src='http://www.infosecpodcast.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I would like to have had a little more involvement in that piece of the process. It would have been good to have you and your perspective there.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan shimel</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2008/10/nac-panel-discussion-what-is-the-state-of-nac/comment-page-1/#comment-28720</link>
		<dc:creator>alan shimel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/?p=184#comment-28720</guid>
		<description>Chris - I am crushed! You had a NAC panel and discussion and didn&#039;t even invite me?  Whats up with that!  I hope you have a good excuse

alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; I am crushed! You had a NAC panel and discussion and didn&#8217;t even invite me?  Whats up with that!  I hope you have a good excuse</p>
<p>alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.502 seconds -->
