<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NitroSecurity files for IPO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/</link>
	<description>Information Security related news, opinions and ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:44:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-27866</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/#comment-27866</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never made it down the IPO road before. I was working for Uncle Sam during most of the boom so most of it is somewhat foreign to me. I&#039;ll take your word for it :)

Damn it!  I have to shmooze a client tonight. Why does that always happen???  Have fun tonight....I&#039;ll try harder to make the next one.

--Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never made it down the IPO road before. I was working for Uncle Sam during most of the boom so most of it is somewhat foreign to me. I&#8217;ll take your word for it <img src='http://www.infosecpodcast.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Damn it!  I have to shmooze a client tonight. Why does that always happen???  Have fun tonight&#8230;.I&#8217;ll try harder to make the next one.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christofer Hoff</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-27864</link>
		<dc:creator>Christofer Hoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/#comment-27864</guid>
		<description>I am sure their revenue is higher this year...it better be.  But there&#039;s a baseline set of table stakes when filing and they&#039;re based upon one critical element...predictability.

While some might suggest that the guidelines have relaxed a little (not as bad as in the boom days) the fact is that the market wants to see sustained growth that offers a smooth curve, NOT a quarter-on-quarter or YOY hockey stick.

Given the last set of published financials, even if they did 5 times the revenue, it&#039;s just NOT a good story, IP be damned.

I hope for the best for NS and more specifically for YOU, but this is just screwy. 

To me, this is just a way of saying &quot;Hey, look over here...&quot;  I know all about the IP and the defensive strategy involved with it (read: lawsuits for enforcement) but let&#039;s call a duck a duck.

Enough beating a dead horse.

You coming to BeanSec! tonight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure their revenue is higher this year&#8230;it better be.  But there&#8217;s a baseline set of table stakes when filing and they&#8217;re based upon one critical element&#8230;predictability.</p>
<p>While some might suggest that the guidelines have relaxed a little (not as bad as in the boom days) the fact is that the market wants to see sustained growth that offers a smooth curve, NOT a quarter-on-quarter or YOY hockey stick.</p>
<p>Given the last set of published financials, even if they did 5 times the revenue, it&#8217;s just NOT a good story, IP be damned.</p>
<p>I hope for the best for NS and more specifically for YOU, but this is just screwy. </p>
<p>To me, this is just a way of saying &#8220;Hey, look over here&#8230;&#8221;  I know all about the IP and the defensive strategy involved with it (read: lawsuits for enforcement) but let&#8217;s call a duck a duck.</p>
<p>Enough beating a dead horse.</p>
<p>You coming to BeanSec! tonight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StillSecure, After All These Years</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-27822</link>
		<dc:creator>StillSecure, After All These Years</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 02:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/#comment-27822</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Killing the goose that lays the golden eggs...&lt;/strong&gt;

Like many of you out there, I have been encouraged this past year to see the return of the IPO as a potential liquidity event for technology and even security companies. Companies like Sourcefire, Aruba Networks and Blade Logic have...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Killing the goose that lays the golden eggs&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Like many of you out there, I have been encouraged this past year to see the return of the IPO as a potential liquidity event for technology and even security companies. Companies like Sourcefire, Aruba Networks and Blade Logic have&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-27814</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/#comment-27814</guid>
		<description>Chris,

I think their revenue numbers are quite a bit higher this year. Maybe that could have something to do with it? There is a lot on the financials of running a company that I just have not had exposure to. I&#039;m the techie not the bean counter :)

Nitro has some outstanding intellectual property. Now that they have added a product to their portfolio that really takes advantage of their IP I think it is a different ball game. I guess we will have to wait and see. 

Thanks for the comment.

--Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I think their revenue numbers are quite a bit higher this year. Maybe that could have something to do with it? There is a lot on the financials of running a company that I just have not had exposure to. I&#8217;m the techie not the bean counter <img src='http://www.infosecpodcast.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Nitro has some outstanding intellectual property. Now that they have added a product to their portfolio that really takes advantage of their IP I think it is a different ball game. I guess we will have to wait and see. </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christofer Hoff</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-27813</link>
		<dc:creator>Christofer Hoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security/2007/08/nitrosecurity-files-for-ipo/#comment-27813</guid>
		<description>Chris -- you&#039;ve got to be raising your eyebrows at this, no?

Not for nothing, but even in today&#039;s InfoSec starved IPO market, how do you go out unprofitable (let alone -$10.4MM) and with only $2.3MM in revenues?

Did someone put the decimal in the wrong spot?

This has got to be April Fools, right!?  If you want to advertise you&#039;re for sale, this is certainly one way of doing so...

Wow.

/Hoff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8212; you&#8217;ve got to be raising your eyebrows at this, no?</p>
<p>Not for nothing, but even in today&#8217;s InfoSec starved IPO market, how do you go out unprofitable (let alone -$10.4MM) and with only $2.3MM in revenues?</p>
<p>Did someone put the decimal in the wrong spot?</p>
<p>This has got to be April Fools, right!?  If you want to advertise you&#8217;re for sale, this is certainly one way of doing so&#8230;</p>
<p>Wow.</p>
<p>/Hoff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
