<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft adds &#8216;one-click&#8217; sex offender report tool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/08/microsoft-adds-one-click-sex-offender-report-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/08/microsoft-adds-one-click-sex-offender-report-tool/</link>
	<description>Information Security related news, opinions and ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:44:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/08/microsoft-adds-one-click-sex-offender-report-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security/2006/08/microsoft-adds-one-click-sex-offender-report-tool/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get me wrong...I think the idea has merit. The implementation is where this thing will live or die. Microsoft doesn&#039;t exactly have the best track record for getting things in 1.0 release software :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong&#8230;I think the idea has merit. The implementation is where this thing will live or die. Microsoft doesn&#8217;t exactly have the best track record for getting things in 1.0 release software <img src='http://www.infosecpodcast.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/08/microsoft-adds-one-click-sex-offender-report-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security/2006/08/microsoft-adds-one-click-sex-offender-report-tool/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>This is a very legit idea and i agree with Tony above. Everybody loves causing a stir in the online community so as easy as this will be to report someone, many people will take full advantage and report the most BS conversations. One click is too easy for users, they should have to fill out some sort of incident report every time or else it will be shenanigance all over MSN messenger. 

Nate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very legit idea and i agree with Tony above. Everybody loves causing a stir in the online community so as easy as this will be to report someone, many people will take full advantage and report the most BS conversations. One click is too easy for users, they should have to fill out some sort of incident report every time or else it will be shenanigance all over MSN messenger. </p>
<p>Nate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.infosecpodcast.com/2006/08/microsoft-adds-one-click-sex-offender-report-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infosecpodcast.com/security/2006/08/microsoft-adds-one-click-sex-offender-report-tool/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>As easy as it is for us to criticize MS for their decision, you have to at least keep the fact that they have a ton of paid staff, so there has to be at least one competent worker in the group. They have to expect a good amount of abuse- it&#039;s obvious that at absolutely least, 80% of the clicks will be false. Kids screwing around, at the very least, would generate that.

So, although it seems dumb, they have to have -some- idea of the consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As easy as it is for us to criticize MS for their decision, you have to at least keep the fact that they have a ton of paid staff, so there has to be at least one competent worker in the group. They have to expect a good amount of abuse- it&#8217;s obvious that at absolutely least, 80% of the clicks will be false. Kids screwing around, at the very least, would generate that.</p>
<p>So, although it seems dumb, they have to have -some- idea of the consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
